Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queensbury special school
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Erdington. Would redirect to #Education, but currently no education info in target article. Black Kite 01:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Queensbury special school (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable school lacking WP:RS for WP:V, and written from a somewhat childish standpoint, that will have to be fundamentally re-written if the article is kept. No incoming links from other wiki articles either. Flewis(talk) 14:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no claim of or evidence of notability, clear failure of WP:N so clear delete. Theseeker4 (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, also written as an advertisement. (EhJJ)TALK 16:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Comment This article would be easy enough to clean up. I'll take a quick jab at it, as it should meet notability criteria as any other school. (EhJJ)TALK 02:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to Erdington#Education per normal practice. TerriersFan (talk) 18:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- TerriersFan. This is a dreadful little article, which might have been improved. However while the consensus is that High Schools are notable, speical schools probably are not. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Far from dreadful this is a heart-warming little article, that unfortunately can not remain in WP. I for one would like to thank the author and anyone who helped them, and encourage them to continue to try to find ways to help wikipedia, and to not be distraught that this article needs to be deleted. Having said that, my !vote, reluctantly, is delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 01:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect per TerriersFan. Cunard (talk) 08:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.